Clive Hazell, Ph.D.
PP 7203 Research Methods
Spring 2005
Argosy University
Illinois School for Professional Psychology
Syllabus: Spring 2005
Research Methods
Clive Hazell
3658 North Saint Louis Avenue
Chicago
Illinois 60618
Tel: 773-583-9239
Email: chazell@chi.devry.edu
It is the purpose of this course to survey the field of research methodology in such a way as to enable the student to…
a. Generate a viable research design of their own, and
b. Critically evaluate research methods as used by fellow professional psychologists,
c. Be capable of applying a wide array of research concepts (both quantitative and qualitative) to the evaluation of research studies both of others and of their own design
d. Be aware of fundamental epistemological problems involved in research methods and of ethical ways of confronting these problems and
e. Be aware of the influence culture, ethnicity, class, role and gender may have in influencing the research process.
“Surviving your Dissertation”, Rudestam, K and Newton, R., Sage, London, 1992
“Dictionary of Statistics and Methodology”, Vogt, W., Sage, London, 1993.
“An Introduction to Qualitative Research”, Flick, U., Sage, London, 2002.
(Rudestam and Newton)
1 Introduction 1-3
Types of Research
Proposals
2 Types of Research
Generating Questions
Evaluating Research 4-5
3. Evaluating Research
Measurement Problems 5-6
4. Classic Design Errors
Students evaluate studies 7
5. Quasi- Experimental Designs 8-10
Control and Interpretability
6. Cultural Issues and Research Design
Students Evaluate Studies 12
7. Qualitative Research (see Flick, assigned
sections)
Grounded Theory
8. Qualitative Research
Narrative, Episodic and Ethnographic
Approaches.
9. Qualitative Research
Interpreting the Data
10. Development of Measures
Interviewing
Questionnaire and Survey Design
11. Ethical Issues in Research 12
12. Single Case Studies
Clinical Research
13. Evaluation of Studies brought in by students
Presentation of Findings
14. Statistics, selecting the correct tool
15. Presentation and evaluation of student proposals.
Final Research Proposal 60%
In class activities 10%
Research Study Critiques (4) 20%
Research Proposal Presentation 10%
Total 100%
Proposal:
The final research proposal should follow the outline furnished by the instructor and should describe a potential viable EMPIRICAL research design in an area of interest to the student. This design could be quantitative or qualitative. It should demonstrate mastery of the concepts covered in the class and should thus have the potential to lead to a publication in a scholarly, refereed journal.
Research study critique (4)
The research study critique presentation is a 15 – 20 minute presentation of a critical analysis of an empirical study in the student’s area of interest. The student should furnish the rest of the group with a one page typed summary of the research paper to be critiqued and give a presentation and lead a critical discussion concerning the study. The presentation/discussion should utilize at least three of the concepts covered in the class and should point out strengths and weaknesses of the research design. The instructor will furnish the students with two outlines to help structure this presentation.
The proposal presentation discussion involves the student presenting and “defending” their final research proposal with the rest of the class. The student should furnish the rest of the group with a one-page summary of their proposal. The instructor will provide the proposal outline.
Nota bene: Proposal writing involves fermentation and interaction. Please feel free to ask questions regarding your proposal throughout, either in-class or out-of-class.
Special Needs
Students who have special needs regarding the class by virtue of a disability (or any other situation) are encouraged to let the instructor know as soon as is possible so that reasonable accommodations might be made.